License for Use of "Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology", (CPT) Fourth Edition

End User/Point and Click Agreement: CPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2009 American Medical Association (AMA). All Rights Reserved (or such other date of publication of CPT). CPT is a trademark of the AMA.

You, your employees and agents are authorized to use CPT only as contained in the following authorized materials including but not limited to CGS fee schedules, general communications, Medicare Bulletin, and related materials internally within your organization within the United States for the sole use by yourself, employees, and agents. Use is limited to use in Medicare, Medicaid, or other programs administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). You agree to take all necessary steps to insure that your employees and agents abide by the terms of this agreement.

Any use not authorized herein is prohibited, including by way of illustration and not by way of limitation, making copies of CPT for resale and/or license, transferring copies of CPT to any party not bound by this agreement, creating any modified or derivative work of CPT, or making any commercial use of CPT. License to use CPT for any use not authorized here in must be obtained through the AMA, CPT Intellectual Property Services, 515 N. State Street, Chicago, IL 60610. Applications are available at the AMA website.

This product includes CPT which is commercial technical data and/or computer data bases and/or commercial computer software and/or commercial computer software documentation, as applicable which were developed exclusively at private expense by the American Medical Association, 515 North State Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60610. U.S. Government rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose these technical data and/or computer data bases and/or computer software and/or computer software documentation are subject to the limited rights restrictions of DFARS 252.227-7015(b)(2)(June 1995) and/or subject to the restrictions of DFARS 227.7202-1(a)(June 1995) and DFARS 227.7202-3(a)June 1995), as applicable for U.S. Department of Defense procurements and the limited rights restrictions of FAR 52.227-14 (June 1987) and/or subject to the restricted rights provisions of FAR 52.227-14 (June 1987) and FAR 52.227-19 (June 1987), as applicable, and any applicable agency FAR Supplements, for non-Department Federal procurements.

AMA Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities.

CPT is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. AMA warrants that due to the nature of CPT, it does not manipulate or process dates, therefore there is no Year 2000 issue with CPT. AMA disclaims responsibility for any errors in CPT that may arise as a result of CPT being used in conjunction with any software and/or hardware system that is not Year 2000 compliant. No fee schedules, basic unit, relative values or related listings are included in CPT. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The responsibility for the content of this file/product is with CGS or the CMS and no endorsement by the AMA is intended or implied. The AMA disclaims responsibility for any consequences or liability attributable to or related to any use, non-use, or interpretation of information contained or not contained in this file/product. This Agreement will terminate upon notice if you violate its terms. The AMA is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement.

CMS Disclaimer

The scope of this license is determined by the AMA, the copyright holder. Any questions pertaining to the license or use of the CPT must be addressed to the AMA. End Users do not act for or on behalf of the CMS. CMS DISCLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY LIABILITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO END USER USE OF THE CPT. CMS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIMS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION OR MATERIAL CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE. In no event shall CMS be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use of such information or material.

This license will terminate upon notice to you if you violate the terms of this license. The AMA is a third party beneficiary to this license.

POINT AND CLICK LICENSE FOR USE OF "CURRENT DENTAL TERMINOLOGY", ("CDT")

End User License Agreement

THE LICENSE GRANTED HEREIN IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONED UPON YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT. BY CLICKING BELOW ON THE BUTTON LABELED "I ACCEPT", YOU HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ, UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT.

IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN, CLICK BELOW ON THE BUTTON LABELED "I DO NOT ACCEPT" AND EXIT FROM THIS COMPUTER SCREEN.

IF YOU ARE ACTING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION, YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON BEHALF OF SUCH ORGANIZATION AND THAT YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT CREATES A LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATION OF THE ORGANIZATION. AS USED HEREIN, "YOU" AND "YOUR" REFER TO YOU AND ANY ORGANIZATION ON BEHALF OF WHICH YOU ARE ACTING.

Subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, you, your employees, and agents are authorized to use CDT-4 only as contained in the following authorized materials and solely for internal use by yourself, employees and agents within your organization within the United States and its territories. Use of CDT-4 is limited to use in programs administered by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). You agree to take all necessary steps to ensure that your employees and agents abide by the terms of this agreement. You acknowledge that the ADA holds all copyright, trademark and other rights in CDT-4. You shall not remove, alter, or obscure any ADA copyright notices or other proprietary rights notices included in the materials.
Any use not authorized herein is prohibited, including by way of illustration and not by way of limitation, making copies of CDT-4 for resale and/or license, transferring copies of CDT-4 to any party not bound by this agreement, creating any modified or derivative work of CDT-4, or making any commercial use of CDT-4. License to use CDT-4 for any use not authorized herein must be obtained through the American Dental Association, 211 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611. Applications are available at the American Dental Association website.
Applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation Clauses (FARS)\Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Restrictions Apply to Government use. Please click here to see all U.S. Government Rights Provisions.
ADA DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIABILITIES. CDT-4 is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. No fee schedules, basic unit, relative values or related listings are included in CDT-4. The ADA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense dental services. The sole responsibility for the software, including any CDT-4 and other content contained therein, is with (insert name of applicable entity) or the CMS; and no endorsement by the ADA is intended or implied. The ADA expressly disclaims responsibility for any consequences or liability attributable to or related to any use, non-use, or interpretation of information contained or not contained in this file/product. This Agreement will terminate upon notice to you if you violate the terms of this Agreement. The ADA is a third-party beneficiary to this Agreement.
CMS DISCLAIMER. The scope of this license is determined by the ADA, the copyright holder. Any questions pertaining to the license or use of the CDT-4 should be addressed to the ADA. End users do not act for or on behalf of the CMS. CMS DISCLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY LIABILITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO END USER USE OF THE CDT-4. CMS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIMS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION OR MATERIAL COVERED BY THIS LICENSE. In no event shall CMS be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use of such information or material.

The license granted herein is expressly conditioned upon your acceptance of all terms and conditions contained in this agreement. If the foregoing terms and conditions are acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by clicking below on the button labeled "I ACCEPT". If you do not agree to the terms and conditions, you may not access or use the software. Instead, you must click below on the button labeled "I DO NOT ACCEPT" and exit from this computer screen.

myCGS Portal

Customer Service

Appeals/Redeterminations

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

FAQs

Fee Schedules/Reimbursement

Forms

Innovations

LCDs / Medical Policies

Medical Review

News & Publications

Overpayments & Refunds

Prior Authorization

Provider Enrollment

Multi-Jurisdictional CAC Meeting – February 28, 2023: Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Bibliography

Amante D, Harlan D, Lemon SC, et al. Evaluation of a Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Facilitated by Connected Glucose Meters for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2021;6(1):e25574. doi:10.2196/25574.

Armstrong DG, Holtz-Neiderer K, Wendel C, Mohler MJ, Kimbriel HR, Lavery LA. Skin Temperature Monitoring Reduces the Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration in High-risk Patients. Am J Med. 2007;120(12):1042-1046. [published correction appears in Am J Med. 2008;121(12). doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.029].

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367-2375. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1615439.

Bashi N, Karunanithi M, Fatehi F, Ding H, Walters D. Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.6571.

Bloss CS, Wineinger NE, Peters M, et al. A prospective randomized trial examining health care utilization in individuals using multiple smartphone-enabled biosensors. PeerJ.2016;4:e1554. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1554.

Boriani, G., Da Costa, A., Quesada, A., et al. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2017;19: 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.626.

Brooks E, Burns M, Ma R, Scholten HJ, Becker S. Remote Diabetic Foot Temperature Monitoring for Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. 2021:13:873-881. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S322424.

Castelyn G, Laranjo L, Schreier G, Gallego B. Predictive performance and impact of algorithms in remote monitoring of chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2021;156(104620):104620. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104620.

Choi WS, Shin IS, Yang JS. Understanding Moderators of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Systems in Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(8):1016-1034.

Dar O, Riley J, Chapman C, et al. A randomized trial of home telemonitoring in a typical elderly heart failure population in North West London: results of the Home-HF study. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009;11:319-325. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn050.

de Farias FAC, Dagostini CM, Bicca YD, Falavigna V, Falavigna A. Remote patient monitoring: A Systematic Review. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2020;26(5):576-583. doi10.1089/tmj.2019.0066.

Golledge J, Fernando M, Lazzarini P, Najafi B, Armstrong DG. The Potential Role of Sensors, Wearables and Telehealth in the Remote Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease. Sensors.2020;20:4527. doi:10.3390/s20164527.

Greenwood DA, Blozis SA, Young HM, Nesbitt TS, Quinn CC. Overcoming Clinical Inertia: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Telehealth Remote Monitoring Intervention Using Paired Glucose Testing in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e178. doi:10.2196/jmir.4112.

Iqbal FM, Lam K, Joshi M, Khan S, Ashrafian H, Daizi A. Clinical outcomes of digital sensor alerting systems in remote monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digital. Medicine. 2021;4(7). doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00378-0.

Jarrin R, Barrett MA, Kaye L, et al. Need for clarifying remote physiologic monitoring reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a respiratory disease case study. npj Digital Medicine. 2021;4(50). doi.10.1038/s41746-021-00421-8.

Joubert M, Benhamou P-Y, Schaepelynck P, et al. Remote Monitoring of Diabetes: A Cloud-Connected Digital System for Individuals With Diabetes and Their Health Care Providers. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2019;13(6):1161-1168. doi:10.1177/1932296819834054.

Kim Y, Park JE, Lee BW, Jung CH, Park DA. Comparative effectiveness of telemonitoring versus usual care for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(10):587-601.

Lavery LA, Higgins KR, Lanctot DR, et al. Home Monitoring of Foot Skin Temperatures to Prevent Ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(11):2642-2647. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.11.2642.

Lavery LA, Higgins KR, Lanctot DR, et al. Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence in High-Risk Patients: Use of temperature monitoring as a self-assessment tool. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(1):14-20. doi:10.2337/dc06-1600.

Lee PA, Greenfield G, Pappas Y. The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8.

McGillicuddy JW, Gregoski MJ, Weiland AK, et al. Mobile Health Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013; 2(2):e32. Published 2013 Sep 4. doi:10.2196/resprot.2633.

Mhanna, M., Beran, A., Nazir, S. et al. Efficacy of remote physiological monitoring-guided care for chronic heart failure: an updated meta-analysis. Heart Failure Reviews.2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10176-9.

Morgan AU, Balachandran M, Do D, Lam D, et al. Remote Monitoring of Patients with Covid-19: Design, implementation, and outcomes of the first 3,000 patients in COVID Watch. NEJM Catalyst. 2020. DOI: 10.1056/CAT.20.0342.

Noah B, Keller MS, Mosadeghi S, et al. Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NPJ Digital Medicine.2018;1:20172. doi.10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4.

Ong MK, Romano PS, Edgington S, et al. Effectiveness of remote patient monitoring after discharge of hospitalized patients with Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition -- Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):310-318. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7712

Pritchett JC, Borah BJ, Desai AP, et al. Association of a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Program With Reduced Hospitalizations in Cancer Patients With COVID-19. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(9):e1293-e1302. doi:10.1200/OP.21.00307.

Reyzelman AM, Koelewyn K, Murphy M, et al. Continuous Temperature-Monitoring Socks for Home Use in Patients With Diabetes: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(12):e12460. doi:10.2196/12460.

Reyzelman AM, Shih CD, Tovmassian G, et al. An Evaluation of Real-world Smart Sock-Based Temperature Monitoring Data as a Physiological Indicator of Early Diabetic Foot Injury: Case-Control Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(4):e31870. doi:10.2196/31870.

Rhythm Management Group. Poised for Flight: Remote Physiological Monitoring Has Arrived. Connectivity Report 2022. https://www.myrhythmnow.com/state-of-rpm-download-page/. Published January 2022.

Russo, V, Rapacciuolo, A, Rago, A, et al. Early evaluation of atrial high rate episodes using remote monitoring in pacemaker patients: Results from the RAPID study. Journal of Arrhythmia. 2022;38:213– 220. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12685.

Scholten H, Shih CD, Ma R, Malhotra K, Reyzelman A. Utilization of a Smart Sock for the Remote Monitoring of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy: Cross-sectional Study of a Real-world Registry. JIMR Form Res. 2022;6(3):e32934.

Shufelt, C., Dzubur, E., Joung, S, et al. A protocol integrating remote patient monitoring patient reported outcomes and cardiovascular biomarkers. npj Digital. Medicine. 2019; 2(84). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0145-6.

Taylor ML, Thomas EE, Snoswell CL, Smith AC, Caffery L. Does remote patient monitoring reduce acute care use? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e040232.

Tildesley HD, Po MD, Ross SA. Internet blood glucose monitoring systems provide lasting glycemic benefit in type 1 and 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(1):17-33. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.08.019.

Totten AM, Womack DM, Eden KB, et al. Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews. Technical Brief Number 26. AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC034-EF. June 2016.

Vegesna A, Tran M, Angelaccio M, Arcona S. Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2017;23(1):3-17. doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0051.

Wijsman CA, Westendorp RG, Verhagen EA, et al. Effects of a Web-Based Intervention on Physical Activity and Metabolism in Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e233. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2843.

Additional Evidence Submitted by Panelists in Response to Draft Bibliography

Correia FD, Nogueira A, Magalhães I, et al. Medium-Term Outcomes of Digital Versus Conventional Home-Based Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective, Parallel-Group Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(1):e13111. Published 2019 Feb 28. doi:10.2196/13111.

Gruner MP, Hogaboom N, Hasley I, et al. Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Digital Exercise Therapy Application Compared With Conventional Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Nonoperative Knee Conditions. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;3(4):100151. Published 2021 Aug 1. doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100151.

Hewitt S, Sephton R, Yeowell G. The Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in the Management of Musculoskeletal Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e15617. Published 2020 Jun 5. doi:10.2196/15617.

Hong M, Topete M, Yang M, Bailey JF. Effects of a Digital Musculoskeletal Acute Care Program on Chronic Pain Prevention: An Observational Study with Nonparticipant Comparison Group. J Pain Res. 2022;15:3605-3613. Published 2022 Nov 17. doi:10.2147/JPR.S385134.

Huber S, Priebe JA, Baumann KM, Plidschun A, Schiessl C, Tölle TR. Treatment of Low Back Pain with a Digital Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment App: Short-Term Results. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(2):e11. Published 2017 Dec 4. doi:10.2196/rehab.9032.

Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, et al. Asynchronous and Tailored Digital Rehabilitation of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pain Res. 2022;15:53-66. Published 2022 Jan 8. doi:10.2147/JPR.S343308.

Kuether J, Moore A, Kahan J, et al. Telerehabilitation for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Pilot Series with High Patient Satisfaction. HSS J. 2019;15(3):221-225. doi:10.1007/s11420-019-09715-w.

Marques A, Bosch P, de Thurah A, et al. Effectiveness of remote care interventions: a systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD Open. 2022;8(1):e002290. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002290.

Marques A., Bosch P, de Thurah A, et al. T. A., & EULAR task force on Points to Consider for the for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (2022). Effectiveness of remote care interventions: a systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD open, 8(1), e002290. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002290.

Priebe JA, Haas KK, Moreno Sanchez LF, et al. Digital Treatment of Back Pain versus Standard of Care: The Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial, Rise-uP. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1823-1838. Published 2020 Jul 17. doi:10.2147/JPR.S260761.

Priebe JA, Utpadel-Fischler D, Toelle TR. Less Pain, Better Sleep? The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Back Pain App on Sleep Quality in Individuals Suffering from Back Pain - a Secondary Analysis of App User Data. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1121-1128. Published 2020 May 20. doi:10.2147/JPR.S232792.

Rassouli F, Boutellier D, Duss J, Huber S, Brutsche MH. Digitalizing multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD with a smartphone application: an international observational pilot study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:3831-3836. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.2147/COPD.S182880.

Shebib R, Bailey JF, Smittenaar P, Perez DA, Mecklenburg G, Hunter S. Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:1. Published 2019 Jan 7. doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0076-7.

Spielmanns M, Gloeckl R, Jarosch I, et al. Using a smartphone application maintains physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a randomised controlled trial [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 21]. Thorax. 2022;thoraxjnl-2021-218338. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218338.

Stark C, Cunningham J, Turner P, Johnson MA, Bäcker HC. App-Based Rehabilitation in Back Pain, a Systematic Review. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1558. Published 2022 Sep 22. doi:10.3390/jpm12101558.

Toelle TR, Utpadel-Fischler DA, Haas KK, Priebe JA. App-based multidisciplinary back pain treatment versus combined physiotherapy plus online education: a randomized controlled trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:34. Published 2019 May 3. doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0109-x.

Wang, G., Yang, M., Hong, M.et al. Clinical outcomes one year after a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program: an observational, longitudinal study with nonparticipant comparison group. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 23, 237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05188-x.