Skip to Main Content

Print | Bookmark | Email | Font Size: + |

February 14, 2023

Multi-Jurisdictional CAC Meeting – February 28, 2023: Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Bibliography

Amante D, Harlan D, Lemon SC, et al. Evaluation of a Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Facilitated by Connected Glucose Meters for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2021;6(1):e25574. doi:10.2196/25574.

Armstrong DG, Holtz-Neiderer K, Wendel C, Mohler MJ, Kimbriel HR, Lavery LA. Skin Temperature Monitoring Reduces the Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration in High-risk Patients. Am J Med. 2007;120(12):1042-1046. [published correction appears in Am J Med. 2008;121(12). doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.029].

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367-2375. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1615439.

Bashi N, Karunanithi M, Fatehi F, Ding H, Walters D. Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.6571External website.

Bloss CS, Wineinger NE, Peters M, et al. A prospective randomized trial examining health care utilization in individuals using multiple smartphone-enabled biosensors. PeerJ.2016;4:e1554. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1554.

Boriani, G., Da Costa, A., Quesada, A., et al. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2017;19: 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.626.

Brooks E, Burns M, Ma R, Scholten HJ, Becker S. Remote Diabetic Foot Temperature Monitoring for Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. 2021:13:873-881. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S322424.

Castelyn G, Laranjo L, Schreier G, Gallego B. Predictive performance and impact of algorithms in remote monitoring of chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2021;156(104620):104620. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104620. 

Choi WS, Shin IS, Yang JS. Understanding Moderators of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Systems in Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(8):1016-1034.

Dar O, Riley J, Chapman C, et al. A randomized trial of home telemonitoring in a typical elderly heart failure population in North West London: results of the Home-HF study. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009;11:319-325. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn050.

de Farias FAC, Dagostini CM, Bicca YD, Falavigna V, Falavigna A. Remote patient monitoring: A Systematic Review. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2020;26(5):576-583. doi10.1089/tmj.2019.0066.

Golledge J, Fernando M, Lazzarini P, Najafi B, Armstrong DG. The Potential Role of Sensors, Wearables and Telehealth in the Remote Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease. Sensors.2020;20:4527. doi:10.3390/s20164527.

Greenwood DA, Blozis SA, Young HM, Nesbitt TS, Quinn CC. Overcoming Clinical Inertia: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Telehealth Remote Monitoring Intervention Using Paired Glucose Testing in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e178. doi:10.2196/jmir.4112.

Iqbal FM, Lam K, Joshi M, Khan S, Ashrafian H, Daizi A. Clinical outcomes of digital sensor alerting systems in remote monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digital. Medicine. 2021;4(7). doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00378-0External website.

Jarrin R, Barrett MA, Kaye L, et al. Need for clarifying remote physiologic monitoring reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a respiratory disease case study. npj Digital Medicine. 2021;4(50). doi.10.1038/s41746-021-00421-8External website.

Joubert M, Benhamou P-Y, Schaepelynck P, et al. Remote Monitoring of Diabetes: A Cloud-Connected Digital System for Individuals With Diabetes and Their Health Care Providers. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2019;13(6):1161-1168. doi:10.1177/1932296819834054External website.

Kim Y, Park JE, Lee BW, Jung CH, Park DA. Comparative effectiveness of telemonitoring versus usual care for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(10):587-601.

Lavery LA, Higgins KR, Lanctot DR, et al. Home Monitoring of Foot Skin Temperatures to Prevent Ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(11):2642-2647. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.11.2642.

Lavery LA, Higgins KR, Lanctot DR, et al. Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence in High-Risk Patients: Use of temperature monitoring as a self-assessment tool. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(1):14-20. doi:10.2337/dc06-1600.

Lee PA, Greenfield G, Pappas Y. The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8.

McGillicuddy JW, Gregoski MJ, Weiland AK, et al. Mobile Health Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013; 2(2):e32. Published 2013 Sep 4. doi:10.2196/resprot.2633.

Mhanna, M., Beran, A., Nazir, S. et al. Efficacy of remote physiological monitoring-guided care for chronic heart failure: an updated meta-analysis. Heart Failure Reviews.2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10176-9.  

Morgan AU, Balachandran M, Do D, Lam D, et al. Remote Monitoring of Patients with Covid-19: Design, implementation, and outcomes of the first 3,000 patients in COVID Watch. NEJM Catalyst. 2020. DOI: 10.1056/CAT.20.0342.

Noah B, Keller MS, Mosadeghi S, et al. Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NPJ Digital Medicine.2018;1:20172. doi.10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4External website.

Ong MK, Romano PS, Edgington S, et al. Effectiveness of remote patient monitoring after discharge of hospitalized patients with Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition -- Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):310-318. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7712 

Pritchett JC, Borah BJ, Desai AP, et al. Association of a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Program With Reduced Hospitalizations in Cancer Patients With COVID-19. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(9):e1293-e1302. doi:10.1200/OP.21.00307.

Reyzelman AM, Koelewyn K, Murphy M, et al. Continuous Temperature-Monitoring Socks for Home Use in Patients With Diabetes: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(12):e12460. doi:10.2196/12460.

Reyzelman AM, Shih CD, Tovmassian G, et al. An Evaluation of Real-world Smart Sock-Based Temperature Monitoring Data as a Physiological Indicator of Early Diabetic Foot Injury: Case-Control Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(4):e31870. doi:10.2196/31870.

Rhythm Management Group. Poised for Flight: Remote Physiological Monitoring Has Arrived. Connectivity Report 2022. https://www.myrhythmnow.com/state-of-rpm-download-page/. Published January 2022.

Russo, V, Rapacciuolo, A, Rago, A, et al. Early evaluation of atrial high rate episodes using remote monitoring in pacemaker patients: Results from the RAPID study. Journal of Arrhythmia. 2022;38:213– 220. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12685.

Scholten H, Shih CD, Ma R, Malhotra K, Reyzelman A. Utilization of a Smart Sock for the Remote Monitoring of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy: Cross-sectional Study of a Real-world Registry. JIMR Form Res. 2022;6(3):e32934.

Shufelt, C., Dzubur, E., Joung, S, et al. A protocol integrating remote patient monitoring patient reported outcomes and cardiovascular biomarkers. npj Digital. Medicine. 2019; 2(84). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0145-6.

Taylor ML, Thomas EE, Snoswell CL, Smith AC, Caffery L. Does remote patient monitoring reduce acute care use? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e040232. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040232External website.

Tildesley HD, Po MD, Ross SA. Internet blood glucose monitoring systems provide lasting glycemic benefit in type 1 and 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(1):17-33. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.08.019.

Totten AM, Womack DM, Eden KB, et al. Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews. Technical Brief Number 26. AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC034-EF. June 2016.

Vegesna A, Tran M, Angelaccio M, Arcona S. Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review. TELEMEDICINE and e-HEALTH. 2017;23(1):3-17. doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0051.

Wijsman CA, Westendorp RG, Verhagen EA, et al. Effects of a Web-Based Intervention on Physical Activity and Metabolism in Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e233. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2843.

Additional Evidence Submitted by Panelists in Response to Draft Bibliography

Correia FD, Nogueira A, Magalhães I, et al. Medium-Term Outcomes of Digital Versus Conventional Home-Based Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective, Parallel-Group Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(1):e13111. Published 2019 Feb 28. doi:10.2196/13111.

Gruner MP, Hogaboom N, Hasley I, et al. Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Digital Exercise Therapy Application Compared With Conventional Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Nonoperative Knee Conditions. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;3(4):100151. Published 2021 Aug 1. doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100151.

Hewitt S, Sephton R, Yeowell G. The Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in the Management of Musculoskeletal Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e15617. Published 2020 Jun 5. doi:10.2196/15617.

Hong M, Topete M, Yang M, Bailey JF. Effects of a Digital Musculoskeletal Acute Care Program on Chronic Pain Prevention: An Observational Study with Nonparticipant Comparison Group. J Pain Res. 2022;15:3605-3613. Published 2022 Nov 17. doi:10.2147/JPR.S385134.

Huber S, Priebe JA, Baumann KM, Plidschun A, Schiessl C, Tölle TR. Treatment of Low Back Pain with a Digital Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment App: Short-Term Results. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(2):e11. Published 2017 Dec 4. doi:10.2196/rehab.9032.

Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, et al. Asynchronous and Tailored Digital Rehabilitation of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pain Res. 2022;15:53-66. Published 2022 Jan 8. doi:10.2147/JPR.S343308.

Kuether J, Moore A, Kahan J, et al. Telerehabilitation for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Pilot Series with High Patient Satisfaction. HSS J. 2019;15(3):221-225. doi:10.1007/s11420-019-09715-w.

Marques A, Bosch P, de Thurah A, et al. Effectiveness of remote care interventions: a systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD Open. 2022;8(1):e002290. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002290.

Marques A., Bosch P, de Thurah A, et al. T. A., & EULAR task force on Points to Consider for the for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (2022). Effectiveness of remote care interventions: a systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD open, 8(1), e002290. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002290.

Priebe JA, Haas KK, Moreno Sanchez LF, et al. Digital Treatment of Back Pain versus Standard of Care: The Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial, Rise-uP. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1823-1838. Published 2020 Jul 17. doi:10.2147/JPR.S260761.

Priebe JA, Utpadel-Fischler D, Toelle TR. Less Pain, Better Sleep? The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Back Pain App on Sleep Quality in Individuals Suffering from Back Pain - a Secondary Analysis of App User Data. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1121-1128. Published 2020 May 20. doi:10.2147/JPR.S232792.

Rassouli F, Boutellier D, Duss J, Huber S, Brutsche MH. Digitalizing multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD with a smartphone application: an international observational pilot study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:3831-3836. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.2147/COPD.S182880.

Shebib R, Bailey JF, Smittenaar P, Perez DA, Mecklenburg G, Hunter S. Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:1. Published 2019 Jan 7. doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0076-7.

Spielmanns M, Gloeckl R, Jarosch I, et al. Using a smartphone application maintains physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a randomised controlled trial [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 21]. Thorax. 2022;thoraxjnl-2021-218338. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218338.

Stark C, Cunningham J, Turner P, Johnson MA, Bäcker HC. App-Based Rehabilitation in Back Pain, a Systematic Review. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1558. Published 2022 Sep 22. doi:10.3390/jpm12101558.

Toelle TR, Utpadel-Fischler DA, Haas KK, Priebe JA. App-based multidisciplinary back pain treatment versus combined physiotherapy plus online education: a randomized controlled trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:34. Published 2019 May 3. doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0109-x.

Wang, G., Yang, M., Hong, M.et al. Clinical outcomes one year after a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program: an observational, longitudinal study with nonparticipant comparison group. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 23, 237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05188-x.

spacer

26 Century Blvd Ste ST610, Nashville, TN 37214-3685 © CGS Administrators, LLC. All Rights Reserved